The Behind the Dense Fog of Sovereignty

Authors

  • Sutoro Eko Yunanto Sekolah Tinggi Pembangunan Masyarakat Desa "APMD" Yogyakarta
  • Guno Tri Tjahjoko A.P.M.D College of Village Community Development

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47431/governabilitas.v1i2.90

Keywords:

people's sovereignty, decolonization, reconstitution and repolitization

Abstract

Government Science has not become a scientific discipline and has not become a perspective in reading phenomena in society with government theories. Where the basic function of government science is to enlighten the government, it must criticize the government, not to insult and deny it, but instead have the aim to glorify, prioritize and strengthen the government. To return the science of government to the ultimate goal of a sovereign people, it is necessary to critically review it from the perspective of decolonization, reconstitution and repolitization.

References

Abrahamsen, R. 2003. African Studies and the Postcolonial Challenge. African affairs, 102 (407), 189-210.
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. 2012. Why States Fail. Foreign Policy, United States : Crown Business
Alexander, Larry, ed. 1999. Constitutionalism: Philosopical Foundations. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Alkatiri, Z., Rizal, J. J., & Sohib, B. 2011. Not Like Eating Chili: Constructing Alternative Cultural Space for the Betawians. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 12 (4), 603-610.
Anderson, Benedict R.OG. 2006. Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Verso books.
------------------------1998. The spectre of comparisons: Nationalism, Southeast Asia, and the world. Verso.
Aristoteles.2016. Politik, Yogyakarta: Narasi-Pustaka Promothea. Diterjemahkan dari Politic 1995, New York: Oxford University Press.
Bhatia, T. K., & Machida, K. 2016. Pioneering Dutch Scholarship on Historical Indology and Linguistic Sciences. Histoire Epistémologie Langage, 38 (1), 39-62;
Blythe, J. M. (2014). Ideal government and the mixed constitution in the middle ages. Princeton University Press)
Boyer, W. W. 1990. Political Science and the 21st Century: From Government to Governance. PS: Political Science & Politics, 23 (1), 50-54
Bronkhorst, B. J. 2011. Indology, What is it Good for?. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft, 161 (1), 115-12;
Budiardjo, Miriam .2008. Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik, Jakarta: Ikrar Mandiriabadi.
Chakrabarti, D. K. 2000. Colonial Indology and Identity. Antiquity, 74 (285), 667-671
Cokrowinoto,Mulyarto. 1985. Ilmu Politik dan Ilmu Pemerintahan. tidak diterbitkan. Yogyakarta : Balai Pembinaan Administrasi Universitas Gadjah Mada
Dimopoulos, K., and Koulaidis, V. 2016. The Socio-Epistemic Constitution of Science and Technology in the Greek Press: an Analysis of Tts Presentation. Public Understanding of Science
Evan. B Peter, Dietrich Rueschemeyer and Theda Skocpol.1985, Bringing The State Back In, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fatouros, A. A. 1976. International Law in the New Greek Constitution. Am. J. Int'l L., 70, 492
Ferraiolo, K. 2013. Is State Gambling Policy “morality policy”? Framing Debates over State Lotteries. Policy Studies Journal, 41(2), 217-242.
Foucault. Michel, 1977-1978. Security, Territory, Population. Lectures At The Collège De France
Furnival J.S. 2009. Samsudin Berlian (penerjemah). Hindia Belanda : Studi tentang Ekonomi Majemuk. Jakarta : Freedom Institute
Gonda, J. 1964. Indology in the Netherlands. Brill Archive
Gluckman, P. 2014. Policy: The Art of Science Advice to Government. Nature News, 507
(7491), 163
Hahm, D. E. 2009. The mixed constitution in greek thought. A Companion to Greek and Roman Political Thought, 32, 178-198
Harriss, J. 2009. Bringing Politics Back Into Poverty Analysis. Poverty Dynamics, 205-24;
Kartodirdjo, Sartono .1993. Pengantar Sejarah Indonesia Baru, Sejarah Pergerakan Nasional. Jakarta: Gramedia.
-----------------------1987. Pengantar Sejarah Indonesia Baru, 1500-1900: Dari Emporium sampai Imperium (Vol. 1). Jakarta : Gramedia.
King, V. T., & Wilder, W. D. 2003. The Modern Anthropology of South-East Asia: An Introduction (Vol. 1). Psychology Press
Kleden, I. 1995. Social Science in Indonesia: Action and Reflection in the Southeast Asian Perspective. Social Science in Southeast Asia. From Particularism to Universalism, 9-33.
Kuitenbrouwer, M. 2014. The Late-Colonial Rise of Indology 1914–1940. In Dutch Scholarship in the Age of Empire and Beyond ,Brill , pp. 123-159
Kumlin, S., & Haugsgjerd, A. 2017. The Welfare State and Political Trust: Bringing Performance Back in. Handbook on Political Trust. Edward Elgar Publishing
Lind,Michael. 2020. The New Class War : Saving Democracy From The Managerial Elite. Nee York : Harper
Leftwich, A. 1995. Bringing Politics Back in: Towards a Model of the Developmental State. The Journal of Development Studies, 31(3), 400-427
Mamdani, Mahmood. 2018. Citizen and Subject: Contemporary Africa and the Legacy of Late Colonialism. Princeton University Press
McAllister, I. 2014. Public Opinion Towards Gambling and Gambling Regulation in Australia. International Gambling Studies, 14(1), 146-160
Mill, J. S. 2010. The Basic Writings of John Stuart Mill: On Liberty, the Subjection of Women and Utilitarianism. Modern Library.
Morgenthau, J.Hans.1978.Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, Fifth Edition, Revised. New York: Alfred A. Knopf
Örnberg, J. C., and Tammi, T. 2011. Gambling Problems as a Political Framing-Safeguarding the Monopolies in Finland and Sweden. Journal of Gambling Issues, (26), 110-125;
Osborne, D. 1993. Reinventing Government. Public Productivity and Management Review, 349-356
Pierce, P. A., & Miller, D. E. 1999. Variations in the Diffusion of State Lottery Adoptions: How Revenue Dedication Changes Morality Politics 1. Policy Studies Journal, 27(4), 696-706;
Plato, 2015. Republik. Yogyakarta: Narasi-Pustaka Promothea. diterjemahkan dari The Republic .1992, New York: Quality Paperback Book Club.
Pratt, N. 2004. Bringing Politics Back in: Examining the Link Between Globalization and Democratization. Review of International Political Economy, 11 (2), 311-336
Rodrik, D., & Zeckhauser, R. 1988. The Dilemma of Government Responsiveness. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 7 (4), 601-620
Rose, N., & Miller, P. 1992. Political Power Beyond the State: Problematics of Government. British Journal of Sociology, 173-205
Said, Edward W. 1979. Orientalism. Vintage.
Scaff, L. A. 1980. Bringing Politics Back In. The Journal of Politics, 42(4), 1155-1159
Soemadjan,Selo. 2000. “Gagasan Selo Soemardjan tentang Otonomi Desa Adat “ Prosiding Simposium Internasional Jurnal ANTROPOLOGI INDONESIA I Makassar
Tuck, R. 1993. Philosophy and Government 1572-1651 (No. 26). Cambridge University Press
Van Poelje, Gerrit Abraham. 1953. Pengantar Umum Ilmu Pemerintahan = Hand en leerboek der bestuurswetenschappen. Jakarta : Soeroengan
von Herrmann, D. K. 2005. Gambling Politics: State Government and the Business of Betting. Perspectives on Politics, 3(2), 384-385;
Wilson, W. 1890. Congressional Government a Study in American politics. Woodrow Wilson.
Weiss, T. G. 2009. What Happened to the Idea of World Government. International Studies Quarterly, 53(2), 253-271 ;
Weiss, J. A. 1989. The Powers of Problem Definition: The Case of Government Paperwork. Policy Sciences, 22(2), 97-121
Yunanto. Sutoro Eko. 2020 Ilmu Pemerintahan: Anti pada Politik, Lupa pada Hukum,
dan Enggan pada Administrasi. Governabilitas,Vol.I No.1, Juni, hal. 1-17

Downloads

Published

2020-12-31