Implementasi Kebijakan Penyediaan Beras Bagi Aparatur Sipil Negara: Perspektif Model Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF)

(Studi pada Peraturan Bupati Nomor 64 Tahun 2021, Pemerintah Kabupaten Sumenep)

Authors

  • Mashur Hasan Bisri Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Candra Dinata Universitas Merdeka Malang
  • Sarmini Sarmini Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Gading Gamaputra Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Galih Wahyu Pradana Universitas Negeri Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47431/jirreg.v9i1.650

Keywords:

State Civil Apparatus (ASN), policy implementation, State Civil Apparatus (ASN), Policy implementation, Sumenep district government

Abstract

Implementation of policy Number 64 of 2021 concerning the provision of rice for the State Civil Apparatus (ASN) as a form of government favoritism to empower farmers by buying local agricultural products due to food price instability, economically affecting ASN's food needs so that ASN performance productivity decreases. This research study aims to explain the implementation of the rice provision policy for ASN based on Regent Regulation Number 64 of 2021 in Sumenep district, in the perspective of the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) Model. The research method used is qualitative research. The results of this study are first, individual actors influencing the policy-making process of providing rice for ASN provide input in formulating strategies or actions taken to achieve the desired goals and objectives of the rice provision policy for ASN. However, the implementation of this policy considers aspects of sustainability and is not only temporary in order to provide sustainable benefits for ASN in the Sumenep district government. second, group actors have different roles depending on the stage of the ongoing policy cycle. group actors can assist in identifying problems or issues raised in the rice provision policy process for ASN.

References

Ahmad Z, Mubin S, Masood R, Ullah F, Khalfan M. Developing a performance evaluation framework for public private partnership projects. Buildings. 2022;12(10). doi:10.3390/buildings12101563

Akomea-Frimpong I, Jin X, Osei-Kyei R. Mapping studies on sustainability in the performance measurement of public-private partnership projects: A systematic review. Sustainability (Switzerland). 2022;14(12). doi:10.3390/su14127174

Ann J, Ewalt G. Theories of governance and new public management: Links to understanding welfare policy implementation. Public Policy and Administration. 2001.

Antle JM, Pizer WA. Local content requirements in extractive industries: An overview of policy approaches and implementation challenges. World Development. 2013;50:51–62.

Antle JM, Pizer WA, Turner MR. The impact of local content requirements on investment and economic development. J Environ Econ Manag. 2010;60(3):273–89.

Birkland TA. Introduction to the policy process: Theories, concepts and models of public policy making. 4th ed. Routledge; 2016.

BPS. Kabupaten Sumenep dalam Angka. Sumenep: Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS); 2021.

BPS. Kabupaten Sumenep dalam Angka. Sumenep: Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS); 2022.

Brass DJ, Galaskiewicz J, Greve HR, Tsai W. Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Acad Manag J. 2004;47(6):795–817. doi:10.5465/20159624

Broadbent J, Laughlin R. Public private partnerships: an introduction. Account Audit Account J. 2003;16(3):332–41. doi:10.1108/09513570310482282

Brunner RD. The policy movement as a policy problem. Policy Sci. 1991;24(1):65–98.

Cairney P, Jones MD. Kingdon’s multiple streams approach: What is the empirical impact of this universal theory? Policy Stud J. 2016;44(1):37–58.

Cicerchia A. Indicators for local policies of cultural welfare: content, dimensions, and quality criteria. City Territory Archit. 2022;9(1):32. doi:10.1186/s40410-022-00179-w

Cohen MD, March JG, Olsen JP. A garbage can model of organizational choice. Adm Sci Q. 1972;17(1):1–25.

Creswell JW. Research design: Pendekatan kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan mixed. Edisi terjemahan ke-4. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar; 2016.

Curtinaz Menezes D, Mota Vieira D. Stakeholders, critical success factors, and value creation in public-private partnerships. Rev Adm Publica. 2022;56(1). doi:10.1590/0034-761220200659

De Faria Silva R, Souza A, Kaczam F, Dalazen LL, da Silva WV, da Veiga CP. Public-private partnerships and value for money. Public Works Manag Policy. 2022;27(4):347–70. doi:10.1177/1087724X221108149

DeGroff A, Cargo M. Policy implementation: Implications for evaluation. New Dir Eval. 2009;124:47–60. doi:10.1002/ev.313

DeLeon P. The stages approach to the policy process: What has it done? Where is it going? In: Sabatier PA, Boulder C, editors. Theories of the policy process. Westview Press; 1999.

Dunn WN. Pengantar analisis kebijakan publik. Edisi terjemahan ke-2. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press; 2003.

Dye TR. Understanding public policy. 15th ed. Pearson; 2017.

Feingold E, Walt G. Health policy: An introduction to process and power. J Public Health Policy. 1995;16(4):506.

Frynas JG, Mellahi K. Local content requirements in developing countries: Balancing development and competitiveness. Bus Horiz. 2009;52(6):507–14.

Gebrihet HG. Assessing the status of public-private partnership in Ethiopia: The case of service delivery in unified billing system. Elk Asia Pac J Soc Sci. 2016;3(1).

Haas PM. Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. Int Organ. 1992;46(1):1–35.

Hammond J, Bailey S, Gore OZ, Checkland K, Darley S, McDonald R, Blakeman T. The problem of success and failure in public-private innovation partnerships. J Soc Policy. 2022;51(4).

Hargrove EC. The missing link: The study of the implementation of social policy. Washington DC; 1975.

Hjern B, Porter D. Implementation structures: A new unit of administrative analysis. Organ Stud. 1981;2(3):211–27.

Howlett M. Moving policy implementation theory forward: A multiple streams/critical juncture approach. Public Policy Adm. 2018;34(4):1–26.

Howlett M, McConnell A, Perl A. Streams and stages: Reconciling Kingdon and policy process theory. Eur J Polit Res. 2015;54(3):419–34.

Howlett M, McConnell A, Perl A. Moving policy theory forward: Connecting multiple stream and advocacy coalition frameworks to policy cycle models of analysis. Aust J Public Adm. 2017;76(1):65–79.

Howlett M, Ramesh M. The policy process: An overview. In: The Oxford handbook of public policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2018. p. 27–44.

Hupe PL, Hill MJ. ‘And the rest is implementation’: Comparing approaches to what happens in policy processes beyond great expectations. Public Policy Adm. 2016;31(2):103–21.

Jenkins-Smith HC, Sabatier PA. Evaluating the advocacy coalition framework. J Public Policy. 1994;14(2):175–203.

Jones MD, Peterson HL, Pierce JJ, Herweg N, Bernal A, Raney HL, Zahariadis N. A river runs through it: A multiple streams meta-review. Policy Stud J. 2016;44(1):13–36.

Khan A, Khandaker S. A critical insight into policy implementation and implementation performance. Public Policy Adm. 2017;15:538–48.

Kraft ME, Furlong SR. Public policy: Politics, analysis, and alternatives. 4th ed. CQ Press; 2016.

Liu H, Smith J, Matthews J, Sing MCP. Praxis of performance measurement in public-private partnerships: Moving beyond the iron triangle. J Manag Eng. 2016;32.

Lowi TJ. The end of liberalism: The second republic of the United States. New York: W.W. Norton & Company; 1969.

Mugambwa J, Nabeta N, Ngoma M, Rudaheranwa N, Kaberuka W, Munene JC. Policy implementation: Conceptual foundations, accumulated wisdom and new directions. J Public Adm Gov. 2018;8(3):211.

Mukherjee I, Howlett MP. Who is a stream? Epistemic communities, instrument constituencies and advocacy coalitions in multiple streams subsystems. SSRN Electron J. 2015. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2593626

Nugroho R. Kebijakan publik: Formulasi, implementasi dan evaluasi. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo; 2004.

Owens KA. Understanding how actors influence policy implementation: A comparative study of wetland restorations in New Jersey, Oregon, The Netherlands and Finland. Universiteit Twente/CSTM; 2008.

Paudel NR. A critical account of policy implementation theories: Status and reconsideration. Public Policy J. 2010.

Pressman J, Wildavsky A. Implementation. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1973.

Sabatier PA. Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research: A critical analysis and suggested synthesis. J Public Policy. 1986;6(1):21–48.

Sabatier PA, Jenkins-Smith HC. Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder: Westview Press; 1993.

Sabatier PA, Weible CM. The advocacy coalition framework: Innovations and clarifications. In: Sabatier PA, editor. Theories of the policy process. 2nd ed. Westview Press; 2007. p. 189–220.

Smith KB, Larimer CW. The public policy theory primer. 3rd ed. Westview Press; 2017.

Walt G, Gilson L. Reforming the health sector in developing countries: The central role of policy analysis. Health Policy Plan. 1994;9(4):353–70.

Downloads

Submitted

2025-08-27

Accepted

2025-11-01

Published

2025-11-28