OPEN GOVERNMENT INDONESIA (OGI) IN CORRUPTION ERADICATION: A LITERATURE STUDY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47431/governabilitas.v4i1.256Keywords:
Abstract
Open Government is part of the process of preventing corruption by giving the public assurances that they may watch or pay attention to how state administrators behave as reflected in transparency, accountability, participation, and use of technology. The purpose of this study is to determine the role of Open Government in eradicating corruption and the factors that influence it. The method used is a literature review of action plan documents, articles, and other related documents. It is hoped that this research will be useful in knowing the obstacles to preventing corruption through open government. The research was carried out on the action plan carried out by OGI and limited it to two action plans, namely related to the transparency of the procurement sector and beneficial ownerships. It is known that open contracts have not been effective due to differences in perceptions between the public and the government regarding data and collusion with parties related to procurement. For this reason, integrity is needed in the procurement process and leadership commitment regarding the implementation of Perki 21 of 2021. As for the beneficial ownership, data verification and integration are required as well as stricter enforcement of sanctions if they do not report the beneficial owner's data or submit the data incorrectly. In addition, related to community participation, it can be carried out by maximizing the use of SPAN LAPOR.
References
Adam, I., & Fazekas, M. (2021). Are emerging technologies helping win the fight against corruption? A review of the state of evidence. Information Economics and Policy, 57, 100950.
Ananda D & Easter L, Indonesian Corruption Watch (ICW), 2023 Laporan Hasil Pemantauan Tren Penindakan Kasus Korupsi Tahun 2022 “Korupsi Lintas Trias Politika
Baklouti, N., & Boujelbene, Y. (2020). Shadow economy, corruption, and economic growth: An empirical analysis. The Review of Black Political Economy, 47(3), 276–294.
Boone, A. L., & White, J. T. (2015). The effect of institutional ownership on firm transparency
and information production. Journal of Financial Economics, 117(3), 508–533
Janssen, M., & Estevez, E. (2013). Lean government and platform-based governance—Doing
more with less. Government Information Quarterly, 30(S1), S1-S8
Borge Bravo, R., & Esteve del Valle, M. (2017). Opinion leadership in parliamentary Twitter
networks: A matter of layers of interaction? Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 14(3), 263–276
Boudreaux, C. J., Nikolaev, B. N., & Holcombe, R. G. (2018). Corruption and destructive
entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 51(1), 181–202.
Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework 1. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468
Brusca, I., Manes Rossi, F., & Aversano, N. (2018). Accountability and
Transparency to Fight against Corruption: An International Comparative
Analysis
Bowman, J. S., & Stevens, K. A. (2013). Public pay disclosure in state government: An ethical
analysis. American Review of Public Administration, 43(4), 476–492.
Cinintya, C., Gamayuni, R. R. & Dharma, F. (2022). Transparansi, Hasil Audit Laporan Keuangan dan Korupsi pada Pemerintah Provinsi di Indonesia. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 32(9),
Cordis, A. S., & Warren, P. L. (2014). Sunshine as disinfectant: The effect of state freedom of
information act laws on public corruption. Journal of Public Economics, 115, 18–36
Cooray, A., & Dzhumashev, R. (2018). The effect of corruption on labour market outcomes Economic Modelling, 74, 207–218.
Damiati, L. (2016). Hasil Audit Pemerintahan dan Tingkat Korupsi. UIN Syarif
Hidayatullah.
Darusalam, D., & Praditya, D. (2017). Open GovernmentData Sebagai Inisiatif Anti-korupsi di Indonesia: A Cross-Country Comparison. JUSIFO (Jurnal Sistem Informasi), 3(1), 1-14.
Dawes, S. (2010). Penatagunaan dan Kegunaan: Prinsip Kebijakan untuk Berbasis Informasi Keterbukaan dalam e-Government. Kebijakan & Internet, 3(1). manfaat empiris. Kejahatan, Hukum dan Perubahan Sosial, 68, 431-58. Transparansi. Informasi Pemerintah Triwulanan, 27(4),377
Dimas Aufar Dwi Cahya, (2021), Urgensi Open GovernmentMelalui Inisiatif Open Data dalam Mencegah Korupsi Anggaran Penanganan Covid-19 di Indonesia Journal of Governance Innovation Volume 3, Number 1, Maret 2021 (P-ISSN) 2656-6273, (E-ISSN) 657-1714
Dini Arwati (2019) Factor Inhibited Public Participation in Corruption Prevention Through e- Government Aplication in Indonesia,Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal Vol. 11, No. 1 (2019, Special Issue)’Fadli M. R (2021) Memahami metode desain penelitian kualitatif, Humanika, Kajian Ilmiah Mata Kuliah Umum, ISSN: 1412-1271 (p); 2579-4248 (e). Vol. 21. No. 1. (2021). pp. 33-54
Fishenden, J., & Thompson, M. (2013). Digital government, open architecture, and innova- tion: Why public sector it will never be the same again. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(4), 977–1004.
Harrison, et al. (2012). Open Government and e-government: Democratic challenges
from a public value perspective. Information Polity, 17, 83–97
Hessami, Z. (2014). Political corruption, public procurement, and budgetcomposition: Theory and evidence from OECD countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 34, 372–389.
Hossain, A. T., Hossain, T., & Kryzanowski, L. (2020). Political corruption and corporate payouts. Journal of Banking and Finance, 123, 106016.
Janices, P., & Aguerre, N. (2013, October). Open Government Partnership: Argentina action plan. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (pp. 206–209). ACM
Jannah L.M; Sipahutar;Yasin; Hariyati, Desy. Public Information Disclosure: Mapping the Understanding of Multiple Actors in Corruption- Prone Indonesian Provinces. Policy & Governance Review, [S.l.], v. 4, n. 3, p. 167-181, sep. 2020. ISSN 2580-4820.
Jansen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and Open Government:European Research on Electronic Citizen Participation and Engagement in Public Public Policy Making. Information Systems Management, 29(4), 258-268.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial Behavior,
Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4),
–360
Kasasbeh, H. A., Mdanat, M. F., & Khasawneh, R. (2018). Corruption and FDI inflows: Evidence from a small developing economy. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 8(8), 1075–1085.
Meutia, I. F. (2017). Reformasi administrasi publik
Meijer, A. J., Curtin, D., & Hillebrandt, M. (2012). Open government: Connecting vision and
voice. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(1), 10–29.
Miles, M.B, Huberman, A.M, & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis, A. Methods Sourcebook, Edition 3. USA: Sage Publications
Murillo, M. J. (2015). Evaluating the role of online data availability: The case of economic and
institutional transparency in sixteen Latin American nations. International Political Science Review,
(1), 42–59
Park, C. H., & Kim, K. (2020). E-government as an anti-corruption tool: Panel data analysis across countries. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 86(4), 691-707.
Rahayu, Amy Y.S dan Juwono, Visnhu.(2019). Birokrasi & Governance:Teori, Konsep, dan Aplikasinya, Depok:PT. RajaGrafinso Persada
Rilis Media, 2023 Indonesia`s Corruption Perception Index 2022 Experiences the worst decline in the History of The Reform Era, During President Joko Widodo`s Administration, the quality of eradicating corruption and democracy tended to decline .https://ti.or.id/corruption-perceptions-index-2022/, 13 April 2023 (10.53)
Saha, S., Beladi, H., & Kar, S. (2021). Corruption control, shadow economy and income inequality: Evidence from Asia. Economic Systems, 45(2).
Schillemans, T., Van Twist, M., & Van Hommerig, I. (2013). Innovations in accountability: Learn-ing through interactive, dynamic, and citizen-initiated forms of accountability. Public Performance & Management Review, 36(3), 407–435.
Schmidthuber, L., Hilgers, D., Gegenhuber, T., & Etzelstorfer, S. (2017). The emergence of local
open government: Determinants of citizen participation in online service reporting. Government
Information Quarterly, 34(3), 457–469
Piotrowski, S. J et al (2022), The Power of Partnership in Open Governmenty, Reconsidering Multistakeholder Governace Reform, The MIT Press,ISBN: 9780262544597
Peraturan Presiden Nomor 13 Tahun 2018 Penerapan Prinsip Mengenali Pemilik Manfaat dari Korporasi dalam Rangka Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang dan Tindak Pidana Pendanaan Terorisme, 1 Maret 2018. Jakarta : Lembar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2018 Nomor 23
Perpres No. 54 Tahun 2018 tentang Strategi Nasional Pemberantasan Korupsi.20 Juli 2018. Jakarta : Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 108
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. 8 Juli 2003. Jakarta : Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2003 Nomor 4301
Shih, P., Cheng, C., Shih, D., Wu, T., & Yen, D. C. (2022). Who is the most effective country in anti-corruption? from the perspective of Open Government data and gross domestic product. Mathematics (Basel), 10(13), 2180
Soegiono, A. (2017). Agenda open government: Memerangi korupsi melalui inisiatif open data.Integritas, 3(2).
Siti Ngatikoh et al (2020) Transparency in Government: A Review on the Failures of Corruption Prevention in Indonesia Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, volume 122 Annual Conference of Indonesian Association for Public Administration (IAPA 2019)
Susha, I. (2015). Participation in open government. Orebro studies in informatics 8. Orebro Uni-
versity School of Business, Orebro University, Sweden.
Weerakkody, V., Irani, Z., Kapoor, K., Sivarajah, U., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2017). Open data and its usability: An empirical view from the citizen’s perspective. Information Systems Frontiers, 19(2),285–300.
Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C., Becker, M., & Müller, W. M. (2022). Open Government data: A systematic literature review of empirical research. Electronic Markets, 32(4), 2381-2404.
Zakharov, N. (2019). Does corruption hinder investment? Evidence from Russian regions. European Journal of Political Economy, 56, 39–61.
Žuffová, M. (2020). Do FOI laws and Open Government data deliver as anti-corruption policies? evidence from a cross-country study. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 101480.
Downloads
Submitted
Accepted
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 GOVERNABILITAS (Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Semesta)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
