UNDER THE LOCAL REGIME: CHAOS IN VILLAGE LAND MANAGEMENT SUBSEQUENT TO PRIVILEGE OF SPECIAL REGION OF YOGYAKARTA

Authors

  • Dominggus Ndou Baru Sekolah Tinggi Pembangunan Masyarakat Desa APMD
  • Fatih Gama Abisono Nasution Sekolah Tinggi Pembangunan Masyarakat Desa APMD

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47431/governabilitas.v4i1.292

Keywords:

Village Land, Village Government, Sultanate Authority, Authority Dualism

Abstract

This research examines the management and utilization of village land in the Sriharjo Village. This research was conducted based on the problem that village authority was still hampered, impacting the Sriharjo Village’s government was not optimally managing and utilizing village land. The obstruction of village authority was stripped away by regulations from the Sultanate's authority. As a result, there were inconsistencies between Sriharjo Village rules and Sultanate regulations regarding the administration and use of village land. Although this behaviour is frequently observed in the villages of Special Region of Yogyakarta, few people have looked into, dissected, or even criticised this issue. This study aims to reveal how the Village Government responds to the dynamics of regime contestation. This research is a qualitative type with a descriptive method. Observation, interviews, and documentation are used as data gathering methods in Sriharjo Village, Kapanewon Imogiri, Bantul Regency. The study's findings shows that the administration and use of village land in the Sriharjo Village underwent a discourse that gave rise to the dynamics of competition between the Village Law regime and the Privileges Law regime of the Special Region of Yogyakarta. According to Article 76 paragraph (1) of Law Number 6 of 2014 concerning Villages, the Sultanate's authority's use of village land is contrary to village authority. It is evident that the Privileges Law regime weakens local authority while using village land. The Special Region of Yogyakarta Privileges Law, namely from Law No. 13 of 2012, is integrated with the Governor Regulation Number 34 of 2017 on the usage of village land. This study concludes that the administration and use of village land in Sriharjo Village led to a discourse of contestation between the Village Law regime and the Privileges Law regime, and it also resulted in a dualism of power, namely between the Village and the Sultanate.

References

Akbar, Nur Azizah dan Nuruddin Al. 2018. Demokrasi Sinkretis: Dialektika Demokrasi Modern Dengan Institusi Tradisional Di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Rezim Lokal Di Indonesia. pertama. ed. dalam. Willy Purna Samadhi Loggina Novadona Bayo, Purwo Santoso. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Aprilia Ambarwati. 2017. Ketimpangan Akses Tanah Di Perdesaan. Pertama. dalam. Potret Politik & Ekonomi Lokal Di Indonesia.ed. Anang Zakaria. Institute For Reseacrh and Empowerment (IRE) Yogyakarta.

Tilman, Antonio, Dian Aries, Asih Retno, and Land Legalization. 2021. “Legalisasi Tanah Kasultanan Dan Tanah Kadipaten Di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta.” Riau Law Jounal 5(1): 1–13.

Biyan Tirta Wanadhi dan Rizky Septiana Widyaningtyas. 2021. “Implementasi Inventarisasi Tanah Kesultanan Di Daerah Istimwewa Yogyakarta Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2012 Tentang Keistimewaan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta.” http://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/.

Eko, Sutoro. 2005. Manifesto Pembaharuan Desa. 1st ed. Diterbitkan oleh APMD Press, Yogyakarta.

Fatih Gama Abisono. Dalam Bayang-Bayang Otonomi Khusus: Dilema Politik Afirmasi Dan Meritokrasi Dalam Penataan Birokrasi Di Papua: 2016. Peneglolaan Pemerintahan Lokal. dalam. Supardal. (ed) Perpustakaan Pusat APMD.

Fatmawati, Nur Ika. 2018. “Desentralisasi Asimetris, Alternatif Bagi Masa Depan Pembagian Kewenangan Di Indonesia.” Madani Jurnal Politik dan Sosial 10(3): 73–85.

Hasim, Rangga. 2016. “Politik Hukum Pengaturan Sultan Ground Dalam Undang-Undang No. 13 Tahun 2013 Tentang Keistimewaan Yogyakarta Dan Hukum Tanah Nasional.” Arena Hukum 9(2): 207–24.

Hayati, Rahmi et al. 2019. “Praktik Desentralisasi Asimetris Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Pemikiran dan Penelitian Administrasi Publik dan Administrasi Bisnisy 3(2): 131–40.

Jaweng, Endi Robert. 2011. “Kritik Terhadap Desentralisasi Asimetris Di Indonesia.” Analisis CSIS 40(2): 160–76.

Kurniadi, Bayu Dardias. 2012. “Desentralisasi Asimetris Di Indonesia.” Politik dan Pemerintahan: 1–11. https://bayudardias.staff.ugm.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/Desentralisasi-Asimetris-di-Indonesia-LAN-Bdg-26112012.pdf.

Luis Djuanda. 2016. “Analisis Hak Atas Tanah Ulayat Masyarakat Adat Suku Moi Di Kota Sorong Ditinjau Menurut Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria No 5 Tahun 1960.” Lex Administratum 4(4): 56–66. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/administratum/article/view/11824.

Naibaho, Marlina. 2016. “Respon Masyarakat Terhadap Pesan Komunikasi Survei Sosial Ekonomi Nasional Pada BPS Kota Pematangsiantar.” Jurnal Simbolika 2(1): 1–12.

Nurfurqon, Ardika. 2020. “Politik Hukum Otonomi Daerah Studi Terhadap Desentralisasi Asimetris Di Indonesia.” Khazanah Hukum 2(2): 73–81.

Peraturan Lengkap Desa (UU RI No. 6 Tahun 2014). 2017. Redaksi Sinar Grafika.

Pranoto, Carolus Bregas. 2017. “Pembangunan Negara, Hukum Pertanahan Indonesia, Dan Kembalinya Tanah Kasultanan Di Yogyakarta.” Jurnal Politik 3(1).

Prasetyo, Agung Basuki. 2018. “Mengenal Karateristik Pengaturan Tanah Bengkok Di Indonesia.” Law, Development and Justice Review 1(1): 97–104.

Prof. Dr. Sugiyono. 2017. Metode Penelitian Kebijakan. 1st ed. ed. Safitri Yosita Ratri. Bandung: Alfabeta, cv.

Putriyanti, Erma Defiana. 2015. “Dualisme Penerapan Hukum Pertanahan Di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta.” Ilmu dan Budaya 4(2): 4473–87.

Rizza Utami Putri. 2022. “Governability Pemerintah Desa Dalam Pemanfaatan Tanah Kasultanan.” Program Studi ilmu Pemerintahan Sekolah Tinggi Pembangunan Masyarakat Desa “APMD” Yogyakarta.

Savitri, Miya. 2016. “Analisis Kebijakan Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Malang Terhadap Pengelolaan Tanah Bengkok Desa.” Jurnal Panorama Hukum 1(2): 55–68.

Sitorus, E.B. et al. 2007. “Naskah Akademik Rancangan Undang-Undang Tentang Desa.” Naskah Akademik Rancangan Undang-Undang: 1–98. www.forumdesa.org.

Sutoro Eko, M. Barori, Hastowiyono. 2017. Desa Baru Negara Lama. Perpustakaan Pusat APMD.

Syahzevianda, Syahzevianda, Yanis Rinaldi, and Teuku Muttaqin Mansur. 2019. “Implikasi Yuridis Pengaturan Batas Desa Di Aceh.” Syiah Kuala Law Journal 3(3): 348–63.

Umar, Jaenudin. 2021. “Kewenangan Otonomi Daerah: Sistem Pertanahan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta.” Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia 1(2): 114–19.

Wicaksono, Dian Agung, Ananda Prima Yurista, and Almonika Cindy Fatika Sari. 2019. “Mendudukkan Kasultanan Dan Kadipaten Sebagai Subyek Hak Milik Atas Tanah Kasultanan Dan Tanah Kadipaten Dalam Keistimewaan Yogyakarta.” Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional 8(3): 311–28.

Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

Undang-undang Negara Republik Indonesia 1945.

Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 Tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria.

Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2012 Tentang Keistimewaan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta.

Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 Tentang Desa.

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 43 Tahun 2014 Tentang Peraturan Pelaksanaan Undang Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 Tentang Desa

Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 4 Tahun 2007 Tentang Pedoman Pengelolaan Kekayaan Desa.

Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 Tentang Pengelolaan Aset Desa.

Peraturan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta Nomor 1 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pengelolaan Dan Pemanfaatan Tanah Kasultanan Dan Tanah Kadipaten.

Peraturan Gubernur Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta Nomor 34 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pemanfaatan Tanah Desa.

Peraturan Desa Sriharjo Nomor 20 Tahun 2020 Tentang Pemanfaatan Tanah Desa Sriharjo.

Downloads

Submitted

2023-06-29

Accepted

2023-06-29

Published

2023-06-29

How to Cite

Baru, D. N., & Nasution, F. G. A. (2023). UNDER THE LOCAL REGIME: CHAOS IN VILLAGE LAND MANAGEMENT SUBSEQUENT TO PRIVILEGE OF SPECIAL REGION OF YOGYAKARTA. GOVERNABILITAS (Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Semesta), 4(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.47431/governabilitas.v4i1.292